Communication in Relationships: More Than What You Say
Share
Communication in relationships is often treated as a skill — how clearly you speak, how well you explain, how effectively you argue. But in Indian philosophical traditions, speech (vāk) is not merely a behavioral tool. It is an extension of consciousness.
The Vedas treat speech as sacred because words carry consequence. They transmit intention, reveal inner disturbance, and shape relational reality. Speech is never neutral. It reflects the condition of the mind (manas), the emotional field (chitta), and the sense of identity (ahamkāra).
Modern relational conflicts — defensiveness, emotional escalation, passive aggression, silence, digital misinterpretation — are rarely failures of vocabulary. They are expressions of unexamined inner movement.
To understand communication, we must understand the consciousness from which it arises.
Vāk and the Discipline of Speech
In the Bhagavad Gita (17.15), Shri Krishna defines disciplined speech:
“Speech that is truthful, pleasant, beneficial, and not agitating — and the recitation of wisdom — is considered austerity of speech.”
This is profound for relationships.
Speech must be:
- Truthful (satya)
- Non-agitating
- Beneficial
- Measured
Notice: Krishna does not say speech must be pleasing at the cost of truth. Nor does he justify harsh truth without consideration. The emphasis is alignment — clarity without aggression.
In modern relationships, this principle challenges common habits:
- Saying “I’m just being honest” while speaking harshly
- Suppressing truth to avoid discomfort
- Using tone as weapon
- Escalating intensity to dominate
Disciplined speech is not silence. It is proportion.
Saṁskāra: Why We Don’t Hear What Is Said
Every individual carries impressions (saṁskāra) from past experiences. These impressions influence how we interpret tone, silence, disagreement, and even neutral statements.
When a partner says, “We need to talk,” one person may hear collaboration. Another may hear threat. The words are identical. The reaction differs.
This is because we do not respond to speech alone. We respond to memory.
Without awareness, communication becomes repetition of past emotional history.
Applied Vedic psychology teaches that conscious dialogue begins when we recognize:
“This reaction may not belong entirely to the present.”
That pause changes everything.
The Restless Mind and Reactive Speech
In the Bhagavad Gita (6.34), Arjuna describes the mind:
“The mind is restless, turbulent, strong, and obstinate.”
Shri Krishna does not deny this. He acknowledges it — and then emphasizes practice (abhyāsa) and detachment (vairāgya) as means of mastery (6.35).
This is directly applicable to communication.
Reactive speech arises from:
- Mental turbulence (vṛtti)
- Emotional charge
- Ego-defense
If the mind is agitated, speech will transmit agitation. If the mind is steady, speech becomes constructive.
Modern arguments escalate because speech precedes regulation.
Conscious communication requires that awareness comes before articulation.
Ahamkāra: When Communication Becomes Ego-Defense
Many conflicts are not about the issue presented. They are about identity.
Ahamkāra — the sense of “I” — seeks preservation. When challenged, it reacts.
This appears as:
- Refusing to apologize
- Needing to “win” arguments
- Correcting minor details to assert superiority
- Raising voice to maintain control
In these moments, communication shifts from understanding to self-protection.
Krishna repeatedly emphasizes equanimity (samatva) — inner balance amidst dualities. When ego is observed rather than obeyed, tone softens naturally.
Without awareness of ahamkāra, even loving relationships become battlegrounds.
The Chariot Metaphor: Governing Speech Before It Governs You
The Katha Upanishad offers a powerful metaphor:
The body is the chariot.
The intellect (buddhi) is the driver.
The mind (manas) is the reins.
The senses are the horses.
If the reins are uncontrolled, the chariot loses direction.
Applied to communication:
- The senses react.
- The mind interprets.
- Emotion intensifies.
- Speech follows.
If buddhi (discernment) does not guide the mind, words move impulsively.
Conscious relationships require that discernment governs reaction.
Listening as Witness Consciousness
Indian contemplative traditions describe sakshi — the witness state. Listening from sakshi means:
- Not interrupting to defend
- Not interpreting immediately
- Not inserting personal narrative
True listening is restraint of ego-interference.
Most communication fails not because of poor expression, but because of defensive listening.
When listening becomes presence rather than preparation, dialogue deepens.
Digital Communication and Projection
Modern communication often occurs without embodied presence — through text, voice notes, or social media.
Without tone and facial cues, the mind fills gaps. Vṛtti becomes dominant.
A delayed reply becomes rejection.
A short message becomes anger.
Silence becomes abandonment.
The problem is rarely the message. It is projection.
Ancient psychology remains accurate: perception is shaped more by inner conditioning than outer stimulus.
Thus, digital communication requires even greater awareness.
Silence: Avoidance or Regulation?
Silence in relationships can either regulate or punish.
In many traditions, silence is valued as restraint of harmful speech. But when silence becomes withdrawal to manipulate or avoid vulnerability, it creates distance.
The difference lies in intention.
Before choosing silence, one must ask:
Am I pausing to prevent harm, or avoiding necessary clarity?
Disciplined silence protects relationships. Reactive silence erodes them.
Rāga and Dveṣa in Dialogue
Attachment (rāga) and aversion (dveṣa) disturb clarity.
In communication, this appears as:
- Clinging to being right
- Avoiding uncomfortable truths
- Needing constant reassurance
- Resisting feedback
When attachment dominates, tone intensifies. When aversion dominates, communication shuts down.
Balanced dialogue reduces both extremes.
From Reaction to Response
Unconscious communication follows a predictable cycle:
Trigger
→ Mental story
→ Emotional charge
→ Ego defense
→ Reactive speech
Conscious communication inserts awareness:
Trigger
→ Observation of vṛtti
→ Regulation
→ Discernment (viveka)
→ Intentional response
This is the practical application of Krishna’s teaching on equanimity.
Conflict does not disappear. But its destructive force reduces.
Communication as Inner Discipline
Speech shapes intimacy. It builds safety or destabilizes trust.
The sacredness of vāk lies not in ornamented language, but in disciplined use.
When speech is:
- Truthful but not agitating
- Clear but not excessive
- Firm but not ego-driven
Relationships mature.
Conscious communication is not about perfect wording. It is about inner governance.
As Shri Krishna emphasizes throughout the Gita, mastery of the mind precedes mastery of action. Speech is action.
When awareness enters dialogue, relationships shift — not because disagreements vanish, but because reaction transforms into understanding.
And in that transformation, intimacy deepens.